Comments on: The FA Side Step Two-Footed Campaign https://www.sportsbettingday.com/2013/01/the-fa-side-step-two-footed-campaign/ Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:46:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: Farina https://www.sportsbettingday.com/2013/01/the-fa-side-step-two-footed-campaign/#comment-1056 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:46:17 +0000 http://www.sportsbettingday.com/?p=2692#comment-1056 I actually agree with the author, the inconsistency is there. The card proves that referee do not know for sure what the rule is. and that is down to FA to solve

]]> By: Farjad Iftekhar https://www.sportsbettingday.com/2013/01/the-fa-side-step-two-footed-campaign/#comment-1055 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:37:23 +0000 http://www.sportsbettingday.com/?p=2692#comment-1055 In reply to Hageam.

Guess this is the one he is talking about
http://www.sportskeeda.com/2013/01/14/would-kompanys-successful-appeal-set-a-future-precedence-for-two-footed-challenges/
Then the picture in the article shows another thing, and from refs view it looked 2 footed too, so alot of confusion is there.
Acc to the rule as ref saw, he showed red card but perhaps the appeal and decision was fair enough

]]> By: Ganem https://www.sportsbettingday.com/2013/01/the-fa-side-step-two-footed-campaign/#comment-1054 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:26:16 +0000 http://www.sportsbettingday.com/?p=2692#comment-1054 as you said it should be straight RED then there he got RED but then in such a case appeal is significant
I do not agree that such an incident will make people appeal more and even they have. if there is sufficient proof like in Kompany’s case then suspension can be revoked

]]> By: Hageam https://www.sportsbettingday.com/2013/01/the-fa-side-step-two-footed-campaign/#comment-1053 Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:16:15 +0000 http://www.sportsbettingday.com/?p=2692#comment-1053 I think you need to see the sideway view, you may find how it wasnt two footed in a way

]]>